Ethics and responsibilities for the Editors
Manuscripts submitted to the Progress in Color Colorants and Coatings are processed and published at the responsibility of the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board within the determined scopes. The ultimate responsibility for editorial decisions lies with the Editor-in-Chief and/or respective Subject Editor. In the case of the accepted manuscripts, the name of the subject editor appears inside the published paper. Linguistic or copyediting of the manuscript is not expected from the editors, since they have to focus on its scientific aspect, readability, conceptual contents, and the structure for future applicability. Editors are asked not to explain the information of both reviewers and authors to each other, as well as to others. The same attitude of the editorial board members in evaluating the received manuscript only on the basis of scientific quality, without considering the authors and their organisational affiliation. It is the commitment of the Editor-in-Chief editors to do the review process of all manuscripts within the specified time. They are also responsible for selecting expert reviewers among all relevant scientists who have no conflict of interest with any of the respective authors.
Assessing the novelty and consistency of the contents within each manuscript should be done by the subject editor. All editors have to strictly avoid disclosing the unpublished information before publication. Changing the order of authors or adding/deleting the names of authors by editors is strictly prohibited. Editors have to ensure that the review steps and thorough corrections are made for the refereed manuscripts before the acceptance notice.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's original work. The idea remains problematic with unclear definitions and unclear rules. Plagiarism is not in itself a crime but can constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offence. Plagiarism and copyright infringement may overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts.
Plagiarism (including self-plagiarism) or other breaches in publication are taken seriously in PCCC. The rights of authors are protected, and claims of plagiarism or misuse of articles published in the journal are investigated. We use iThenticate (advanced Plagiarism-checking software) in processing the submitted manuscripts to ensure their originality.
All types of plagiarism are strictly prohibited. Manuscripts involved in plagiarism will automatically be rejected, and the authors will not have the right to submit any new manuscript temporarily (for a period of six months). The Editors and reviewers are strongly prohibited from further processing of such misconduct.
If an article is found to have plagiarized other work or contained third-party copyright material without authorization or adequate acknowledgements, or where authorship of the article is contested, JIBS reserves the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies; removing the article from the journal; taking up the matter with the head of department or dean of the author’s institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; proscription of the author from publication in the journal or proper legal action under the principles of COPE.
Corrections
If errors are identified in published articles that do not compromise the overall results or interpretations, the journal will publish a correction notice linked to the original article. The correction notice will specify the changes made and the reason.Retractions
In cases of serious errors, scientific misconduct, or ethical breaches (such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or duplicate publication), the journal may retract the article. A retraction notice will be published, clearly indicating the reason and linked to the original article, which will be marked as retracted.
Policies for using Artificial Intelligence
Authors are solely responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their manuscript and must ensure that it adheres to all of PCCC' publication ethics policies. This includes accepting full accountability for any content produced by AI tools and any violations of publication ethics that may occur.
Although AI can contribute to the writing process, it cannot be considered an author of the manuscript and cannot fulfill authorship criteria. AI programs cannot handle conflicts of interest or manage copyright and license agreements.
Text generated from AI, machine learning, or similar algorithmic tools cannot be used in papers published in PCCC. If technology (AI chatbot ChatGPT and other large language models - LLMs) were used in writing the whole or parts of the manuscript and generating the images or graphical elements, it must be clearly disclosed in the “Materials and Methods” or "Acknowledgements" sections. The authors must provide a detailed explanation about which AI tools were used and how the AI tools were used.
This guideline is in line with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) position statement when using AI or AI-based technology in the preparation or generation of the manuscript of a scientific paper.