Comparative Industrial Wet Processing of Cotton-Spandex Knit Fabric Using Conventional Scouring, Bio-Scouring, and Integrated One-Bath Reactive Dyeing

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Fabric Engineering, Barishal Textile Engineering College, P. O. Box: 8200, Barishal, Bangladesh

2 Department of Wet Processing Engineering, Shahid Abdur Rab Serniabat Textile Engineering College, P.O. Box: 8200, Barishal, Bangladesh

Abstract

The overuse of water, thermal energy, chemicals, and auxiliaries in the processes of pretreatment and reactive dyeing in textile wet processing operations has created a huge burden on the environment and complicated the operations. In the present study, conventional scouring and enzymatic bio-scouring processes and a one-bath reactive dyeing process were compared and contrasted in scouring cotton-spandex knit fabric on a production scale. The single jersey knit fabric made with a batch weight of 435 kg with a liquor ratio of 1:6 was processed by using 95% BCI cotton and 5% spandex. The water consumption, steam requirement, electrical power consumption, process duration, chemical loading, and finished fabric quality performance were evaluated by comparative evaluation. The one-bath route (with integration) was the most energy-efficient of all the routes studied. A 29.4% reduction in water usage was achieved for one-bath processing, which used 56.5 L/kg of fabric compared to 80.0 L/kg of fabric for conventional scouring. The number of stages of operation was shortened from 45 to 27, and the actual processing time was shortened from about 11 h to 7 h 30 min without the need for separate pretreatment and intermediate washing operations. Other benefits include reduction in steam consumption, electrical power requirements, and severity of the chemicals. Quality assurance testing showed finished fabric properties of dimensional stability, spirality, GSM, pH, appearance retention, and color fastness were satisfactory for all processing methods. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.                 Catarino ML, Sampaio F, Gonçalves AL. Sustainable wet processing technologies for the textile industry: a comprehensive review. Sustainability. 2025; 17:3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073041.
  2. Sayam S, Das N, Akter S, et al. Water and electricity consumption patterns with effluent quality in the textile processing industry of Bangladesh. RSC Adv 2025;15:46627-48. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA059 17H.
  3. Sayam, Das N. Biotransformation of textile dyes: mechanism and application. biocentric approaches text. Waste Manag. 2026, 81-102. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-032-04974-2_5.
  4. Hossen MR, Sayam S, Akter S. Sustainable dyeing of silk fabric with mango leaf extract: comparative assessment of natural and metallic mordants on colorimetric and fastness properties. Prog Color Colorant Coat. 2026;19:231-45. https://doi.org/10.30 509/pccc.2025.167632.1433.
  5. Mamun A Al, Bormon KK, Rasu MNS, et al. An assessment of energy and groundwater consumption of textile dyeing mills in bangladesh and minimization of environmental impacts via long-term key per-formance indicators (KPI) baseline. Textiles. 2022; 2:511-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2040029.
  6. Shefa J, Xames MD, Hasan AA, et al. Feasibility study of common effluent treatment plant for management of industrial wastewater: Case study of Bangladeshi textile industries. Environ Qual Manag. 2024; 33:165-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22033.
  7. Imran S, Mujtaba MA, Zafar MM, et al. Assessing the potential of GHG emissions for the textile sector: A baseline study. Heliyon. 2023;9:e22404. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22404.
  8. Rahman M, Rahman MM. Study of the dyeing industry pollution after mandatory installation of ETP in Madhabdi municipality, Bangladesh. Water Sci. 2024;38:158-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23570008.20 24.2313874.
  9. Kadınkız N, Asma A, Demirel G, et al. A comparative study on dyeing capability of conventional and organic cotton fabrics. Tekst Ind. 2023;71:47-62. https://doi.org/10.5937/tekstind2302047K.
  10. Mao X, Zhong Y, Xu H, et al. A novel low add-on technology of dyeing cotton fabric with reactive dyestuff. Text Res J. 2018;88:1345-55. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0040517517700195.
  11. Shu D, Fang K, Liu X, et al. Cleaner coloration of cotton fabric with reactive dyes using a pad-batch-steam dyeing process. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:935-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.080.
  12. Sayam, Das N. Biotransformation of textile dyes: mechanism and application. biocentric approaches. Text Waste Manag. 2025,81-102. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-032-04974-2_5.
  13. [13]         Bristi U, Pias AK, Lavlu FH. A Sustainable process by bio- scouring for cotton knitted fabric suitable for next generation. J Text Eng Fash Technol. 2019; 5. https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2019.05.00179.
  14. Raafi SM, Arju SN, Asaduzzaman M, et al. Eco-friendly scouring of cotton knit fabrics with enzyme and soapnut: An alternative to conventional NaOH and synthetic surfactant based scouring. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e152 36.
  15. Khan MF. Recent advances in microbial enzyme applications for sustainable textile processing and waste management. Sci. 2025;7:46. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/sci7020046.
  16. Sayam S, Das N, Hossain S. Assessment of ETP performance for sustainable denim wastewater management. 3rd Int. Conf Text Sci Eng (ICTSE 2025) with Spec Focus Fash Innov Sustain Appar Prod. 2025, 1-12.
  17. Muralidharan B, Laya S. A new approach to dyeing of 80 : 20 polyester/cotton blended fabric using disperse and reactive dyes. ISRN Mater Sci. 2011;2011:1-12. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/907493.
  18. Ristić N, Jovančić P, Canal C, et al. One-bath one-dye class dyeing of PES/cotton blends after corona and chitosan treatment. Fibers Polym. 2009; 10:466-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-009-0466-1.
  19. Hilal N, Gomaa S, Elsisi A. Improving dyeing parameters of polyester/cotton blended fabrics by caustic soda, chitosan, and their hybrid. Egypt J Chem 2020;63:2-3. https://doi. org/10.21608/ejchem.2020. 25571.2498.
  20. Tegegne W, Tesfaye T, Zeleke Y, et al. One-bath one-dye class dyeing of polyester/cotton blend fabric with disperse dye after esterification of cotton fabric. Discov Mater. 2022;2:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43 939-022-00034-2.
  21. Tegegne W, Haile A. Effect of papain enzyme surface modification on hydrophilic and comfort properties of polyester/cotton blend fabric. Discov Mater. 2024; 4:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-023-00071-5.
  22. Koh J. Alkali-hydrolysis kinetics of alkali-clearable azo disperse dyes containing a fluorosulphonyl group and their fastness properties on PET/cotton blends. Dye Pigment. 2005;64:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.dyepig.2004.03.017.
  23. Kumsa G, Gebino G, Ketema G. One-bath one-step dyeing of polyester/cotton (PC) blends fabric with disperse dyes after acetylation of cotton. Discov Mater. 2021;1:19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-021-00019-7.
  24. Borisova A. One-bath dyeing technology for cotton blended fabric-part 1: elaboration of a dyebath content. Key Eng Mater. 2018; 762:385-9. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.762.385.
  25. Amin MB, Hossain MI, Bahar MI, et al. A Model for the integration of AI technologies into IT management frameworks. Saudi J Eng Technol. 2026; 11:338-48. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2026.v11i04.019.
  26. Bahar MI, Hossain MI, Akter A, et al. A structured engineering framework for cloud-based IT re‎source management. Int J Eng Technol. 2026; 15:1-9. https://doi.org/10.14419/wz5nfj29.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics